
|
Developing High Achievers
"DEVELOPING HIGH ACHIEVERS" Originally published as "Early
Neurological Stimulation" by Carmen L. Battaglia
Surprising as
it may seem, it isn't capacity that explains the differences that exist between
individuals because most seem to have far more capacity than they will ever use.
The differences that exist between individuals seem to be related to something
else. The ones who achieve and out perform others seem to have within themselves
the ability to use hidden resources. In other words, it's what they are able to
do with what they have that makes the
difference. In many
animal-breeding programs the entire process of selection and management is
founded on the belief that performance is inherited. Attempts to analyze the
genetics of performance in a systematic way have involved some distinguished
names such as Charles Darwin and Francis Galton. But it has only been in recent
decades that good estimates of heritability of performance have been based on
adequate data. Cunningham (1991) in his study of horses found that only by using
Timeform data, and measuring groups of half brothers and half sisters could good
estimates of performance be determined. His data shows that performance for
speed is about 35% heritable. In other words only about 35% of all the variation
that is observed in track performance is controlled by heritable factors, the
remaining 65% are attributable to other influences, such as training, management
and nutrition. Cunningham's work while limited to horses provides a good basis
for understanding how much breeders can attribute to the genetics and the
pedigrees. Researchers have studied this phenomena and have looked for new
ways to stimulate individuals in order to improve their natural abilities. Some
of the methods discovered have produced life long lasting effects. Today, many
of the differences between individuals can now be explained by the use of early
stimulation method.
Introduction
Man for
centuries has tried various methods to improve performance. Some of the methods
have stood the test of time, others have not. Those who first conducted research
on this topic believed that the period of early age was a most important time
for stimulation because of its rapid growth and development. Today, we know that
early life is a time when the physical immaturity of an organism is susceptible
and responsive to a restricted but important class of stimuli. Because of its
importance many studies have focused their efforts on the first few months of
life. Newborn pups are
uniquely different than adults in several respects. When born their eyes are
closed and their digestive system has a limited capacity requiring periodic
stimulation by their dam who routinely licks them in order to promote digestion.
At this age they are only able to smell, suck, and crawl. Body temperature is
maintained by snuggling close to their mother or by crawling into piles with
other littermates. During these first few weeks of immobility researchers noted
that these immature and under-developed canines are sensitive to a restricted
class of stimuli which includes thermal, and tactile stimulation, motion and
locomotion. Other mammals
such as mice and rats are also born with limitations and they also have been
found to demonstrate a similar sensitivity to the effects of early stimulation.
Studies show that removing them from their nest for three minutes each day
during the first five to ten days of life causes body temperatures to fall below
normal. This mild form of stress is sufficient to stimulate hormonal, adrenal
and pituitary systems. When tested later as adults, these same animals were
better able to withstand stress than littermates who were not exposed to the
same early stress exercises. As adults, they responded to stress in "a graded"
fashion, while their non-stressed littermates responded in an "all or nothing
way." Data involving
laboratory mice and rats also shows that stress in small amounts can produce
adults who respond maximally. On the other hand, the results gathered from
non-stressed littermate show that they become easily exhausted and would near
death if exposed to intense prolonged stress. When tied down so they were unable
to move for twenty-four hours, rats developed severe stomach ulcers, but litter
mates exposed to early stress handling were found to be more resistant to stress
tests and did not show evidence of ulcers. A secondary affect was also noticed.
Sexual maturity was attained
sooner in the littermates given early stress exercises. When tested for
differences in health and disease, the stressed animals were found to be more
resistant to certain forms of cancer and infectious diseases and could withstand
terminal starvation and exposure to cold for longer periods than their
non-stressed littermates. Other studies involving early stimulation exercises
have been successfully performed on both cats and dogs. In these studies, the
Electrical Encephalogram (EEG) was found to be ideal for measuring the
electrical activity in the brain because of its extreme sensitivity to changes
in excitement, emotional stress, muscle tension, changes in oxygen and
breathing. EEG measures show that pups and kittens when given early stimulation
exercises mature at faster rates and perform better in certain problem solving
tests than non-stimulated mates. In the higher level animals the effect of early
stimulation exercises have also been studied. The use of surrogate mothers and
familiar objects were tested by both of the Kelloggs' and Dr. Yearkes using
young chimpanzees. Their pioneer research shows that the more primates were
deprived of stimulation and interaction during early development, the less able
they were to cope, adjust and later adapt to situations as adults.
While experiments have not
yet produced specific information about the optimal amounts of stress needed to
make young animals psychologically or physiologically superior, researches agree
that stress has value. What also is known is that a certain amount of stress for
one may be too intense for another, and that too much stress can retard
development. The results show that early stimulation exercises can have positive
results but must be used with caution. In other words, too much stress can cause
pathological adversities rather than physical or psychological
superiority.
Methods
of Stimulation
The U.S.
Military in their canine program developed a method that still serves as a guide
to what works. In an effort to improve the performance of dogs used for military
purposes, a program called "Bio Sensor" was developed. Later, it became known to
the public as the "Super Dog" Program. Based on years of research, the military
learned that early neurological stimulation exercises could have important and
lasting effects. Their studies confirmed that there are specific time periods
early in life when neurological stimulation has optimum results. The first
period involves a window of time that begins at the third day of life and lasts
until the sixteenth day. It is believed that because this interval of time is a
period of rapid neurological growth and development, and therefore is of great
importance to the
individual. The "Bio Sensor"
program was also concerned with early neurological stimulation in order to give
the dog a superior advantage. Its development utilized six exercises which were
designed to stimulate the neurological system. Each workout involved handling
puppies once each day. The workouts required handling them one at a time while
performing a series of five exercises. Listed in order of preference the handler
starts with one pup and stimulates it using each of the five exercises. The
handler completes the series from beginning to end before starting with the next
pup. The handling of each pup once per day involves the following
exercises:
- Tactical stimulation (between toes)
- Head held erect
- Head pointed down
- Supine position
- Thermal stimulation.
1. Tactile stimulation Holding the pup in one hand,
the handler gently stimulates (tickles) the pup between the toes on any
one foot using a Q-tip. It is not necessary to see that the pup is feeling
the tickle. Time of stimulation 3 - 5 seconds. (Figure 1) |

Figure 1 |

Figure 2 |
2. Head held erect Using both hands, the pup is
held perpendicular to the ground, (straight up), so that its head is
directly above its tail. This is an upwards position. Time of stimulation
3 - 5 seconds (Figure 2). |
3. Head pointed down Holding the pup firmly with
both hands the head is reversed and is pointed downward so that it is
pointing towards the ground. Time of stimulation 3 - 5 seconds (Figure 3).
|

Figure 3 |

Figure 4 |
4. Supine position Hold the pup so that its back
is resting in the palm of both hands with its muzzle facing the ceiling.
The pup while on its back is allowed to sleep struggle. Time of
stimulation 3-5 seconds. (Figure 4) |
5. Thermal stimulation Use a damp towel that has
been cooled in a refrigerator for at least five minutes. Place the pup on
the towel, feet down. Do not restrain it from moving. Time of stimulation
3-5 seconds. (Figure 5) |

Figure 5 |
These
five exercises will produce neurological stimulations, none of which naturally
occur during this early period of life. Experience shows that sometimes pups
will resist these exercises, others will appear unconcerned. In either case a
caution is offered to those who plan to use them. Do not repeat them more than
once per day and do not extend the time beyond that recommended for each
exercise. Over stimulation of the neurological system can have adverse and
detrimental results. These exercises impact the neurological system by kicking
it into action earlier than would be normally expected. The result being an
increased capacity that later will help to make the difference in its
performance. Those who play with their pups and routinely handle them should
continue to do so because the neurological exercises are not substitutions for
routine handling, play socialization or bonding.
Benefits
of Stimulation
Five
benefits have been observed in canines that were exposed to the Bio Sensor
stimulation exercises. The benefits noted were:
- Improved cardio vascular performance (heart rate)
- Stronger heart beats
- Stronger adrenal glands
- More tolerance to stress and
- Greater resistance to disease.
In tests of
learning, stimulated pups were found to be more active and were more exploratory
than their non- stimulated littermates over which they were dominant in
competitive situations. Secondary effects were also noted regarding test
performance. In simple problem solving tests using detours in a maze, the
non-stimulated pups became extremely aroused, wined a great deal, and made many
errors. Their stimulated littermates were less disturbed or upset by test
conditions and when comparisons were made, the stimulated littermates were more
calm in the test environment, made fewer errors and gave only an occasional
distress when stressed.
Socialization
As each
animal grows and develops three kinds of stimulation have been identified that
impact and influence how it will develop and be shaped as an individual. The
first stage is called early neurological stimulation, and the second stage is
called socialization. The first two (early neurological stimulation and
socialization) have in common a window of limited time. When Lorenz, (1935)
first wrote about the importance of the stimulation process he wrote about
imprinting during early life and its influence on the later development of the
individual. He states that it was different from conditioning in that it
occurred early in life and took place very rapidly producing results which
seemed to be permanent. One of the first and perhaps the most noted research
efforts involving the larger animals was achieved by Kellogg & Kellogg
(1933). As a student of Dr. Kellogg's I found him and his wife to have an
uncanny interest in children and young animals and the changes and the
differences that occurred during early development. Their history making study
involved raising their own new born child with a new born primate. Both infants
were raised together as if they were twins. This study like others that would
follow attempted to demonstrate that among the mammals there are great
differences in their speed of physical and mental development. Some are born
relatively mature and quickly capable of motion and locomotion, while others are
very immature, immobile and slow to develop. For example, the Rhesus monkey
shows rapid and precocious development at birth, while the chimpanzee and the
other "great apes" take much longer. Last and slowest is the human infant.
One of the earliest efforts
to investigate and look for the existence of socialization in canines was
undertaken by Scott-Fuller (1965). In their early studies they were able to
demonstrate that the basic technique for testing the existence of socialization
was to show how readily adult animals would foster young animals, or accept one
from another species. They observed that with the higher level animals it is
easiest done by hand rearing. When the foster animal transfers its social
relationships to the new species, researchers conclude that socialization has
taken place. Most researchers agree that among all species, a lack of adequate
socialization generally results in unacceptable behavior and often times
produces undesirable aggression, excessiveness, fearfulness, sexual inadequacy,
and indifference toward partners.
Socialization studies
confirm that the critical periods for humans (infant) to be stimulated are
generally between three weeks and twelve months of age. For canines the period
is shorter, between the fourth and sixteenth week of age. During these critical
time periods two things can go wrong. First, insufficient social contact can
interfere with proper emotional development which can adversely affected the
development of the human bond. The lack of adequate social stimulation, such as
handling, mothering and contact with others, adversely affects social and
psychological development.
Second, over mothering can prevent sufficient exposure to other individuals, and
situations that have an important influence on growth and development. The
literature shows that humans and animals respond in similar ways when denied
minimal amounts of stimulation. In humans, the absence of love and cuddling
increases the risk of an aloof, distant, asocial or sociopathic individual. Over
mothering can also have its detrimental effects. It occurs when a patient
insulates the child from outside contacts, or keeps the apron strings tight,
thus limiting opportunities to explore and interact. In the end, over mothering
generally produces a dependent, socially maladjusted and sometimes emotionally
disturbed individual. The
absence of outside social interactions for both children and pups usually
results in a lack of adequate learning and social adjustment. Protected
youngsters who grow up in an insulated environment often times become sickly,
despondent, lacking in flexibility and unable to make simple social adjustments.
Generally, they are unable to function productively or to interact successfully
then they become adults.
Owners who have busy life styles with long and tiring work and social schedules
often times cause pets to be neglected. Left to themselves with only an
occasional trip out of the house or off of the property they seldom see other
canines or strangers and generally suffer from poor stimulation and
socialization. For many, the side effects of loneliness and boredom set-in. The
resulting behavior manifests itself in the form of chewing, digging, and hard to
control behavior (Battaglia).
It seems clear that small
amounts of stress followed by early socialization can produce beneficial
results. The danger seems to be in not knowing where the thresholds are for over
and under stimulation. Many improperly socialized youngsters develop into older
individuals unprepared for adult life, unable to cope with its challenges, and
interactions. Attempts to re-socialize them when adults have only produced small
gains. These failures confirm the notion that the window of time open for early
neurological and social stimulation only comes once. After it passes, little or
nothing can be done to overcome the negative effects of too much or too little
stimulation. The third and
final stage in the process of growth and development is called enrichment.
Unlike the first two stages it has no time limit and by comparison covers a very
long period of time. Enrichment is a term which has come to mean the positive
sum of experiences, which have a cumulative effect upon the individual.
Enrichment experiences typically involve exposure to a wide variety of
interesting, novel, and exciting experiences with regular opportunities to
freely investigate, manipulate, and interact with them. When measured in later
life, the results show that those reared in an enriched environment tend to be
more inquisitive and are more able to perform difficult tasks. The educational
TV program called Sesame Street is perhaps the best known example of a
children's enrichment program. The results show that when tested, children who
regularly watched this program performed better than playmates who did not.
Follow up studies show that those who regularly watched Sesame tend to seek a
college education and when enrolled, performed better than playmates who were
not regular watchers of the Sesame Street Program.
There are numerous children
studies that show the benefits of enrichment techniques and programs. Most focus
on improving self-esteem and self-talk. Follow up studies show that the enriched
Sesame Street students when later tested were brighter and scored above average
and most often were found to be the products of environments that contributed to
their superior test scores. On the other hand, those whose test scores were
generally below average, (labeled as dull) and the products of underprivileged
or non- enriched environments often times had little or only small amounts of
stimulation during early childhood and only minimal amounts of enrichment during
their developmental and formative years. Many were characterized as children who
grew up with little interaction with others, poor parenting, few toys, no books
and a steady diet of TV soap operas.
A similar analogy can be
found among canines. All the time they are growing they are learning because
their nervous systems are developing and storing information that may be of
inestimable use at a later date. Studies by Scott and Fuller confirm that
non-enriched pups when given free choice preferred to stay in their kennels.
Other litter mates who were given only small amounts of outside stimulation
between five and eight weeks of age were found to be very inquisitive and very
active. When kennel doors were left open, the enriched pups would come bounding
out while littermates who were not exposed to enrichment would remain behind.
The non-stimulated pups would typically be fearful of unfamiliar objects and
generally preferred to withdraw rather than investigate. Even well bred pups of
superior pedigrees would not explore or leave their kennels and many were found
difficult to train as adults. These pups in many respects were similar to the
deprived children. They acted as if they had become institutionalized,
preferring the routine and safe environment of their kennel to the stimulating
world outside their immediate place of residence.
Regular trips to the park,
shopping centers and obedience and agility classes serve as good examples of
enrichment activities. Chasing and retrieving a ball on the surface seems to be
enriching because it provides exercise and includes rewards. While repeated
attempts to retrieve a ball provide much physical activity, it should not be
confused with enrichment exercises. Such playful activities should be used for
exercise and play or as a reward after returning from a trip or training
session. Road work and chasing balls are not substitutes for trips to the
shopping mall, outings or obedience classes most of which provide many
opportunities for interaction and investigation.
Finally it seems clear that
stress early in life can produce beneficial results. The danger seems to be in
not knowing where the thresholds are for over and under stimulation. However,
the absence or the lack of adequate amounts of stimulation generally will
produce negative and undesirable results. Based on the above it is fair to say
that the performance of most individuals can be improved including the
techniques described above. Each contributes in a cumulative way and supports
the next stage of development.
Conclusion
Breeders can now
take advantage of the information available to improve and enhance performance.
Generally, genetics account of about 35% of the performance but the remaining
65% (management, training, nutrition) can make the difference. In the management
category it has been shown that breeders should be guided by the rule that it is
generally considered prudent to guard against under and over stimulation. Short
of ignoring pups during their first two months of life, a conservative approach
would be to expose them to children, people, toys and other animals on a regular
basis. Handling and touching all parts of their anatomy is also necessary to
learn as early as the third day of life. Pups that are handled early and on a
regular basis, generally do not become hand shy as adults.
Because of the risks
involved in under stimulation a conservative approach to using the benefits of
the three stages has been suggested based primarily on the works of Arskeusky,
Kellogg, Yearkes and the "Bio Sensor" program (later known as the "Super Dog
Program"). Both experience
and research have dominated the beneficial effects that can be achieved via
early neurological stimulation, socialization and enrichment experiences. Each
has been used to improve performance and to explain the differences that occur
between individuals, their trainability, health and potential. The cumulative
effects of the three stages have been well documented. They best serve the
interests of owners who seek high levels of performance when properly used. Each
has a cumulative effect and contributes to the development and the potential for
individual performance.
References:
- Battaglia, C.L., "Loneliness and Boredom" Doberman Quarterly, 1982.
- Kellogg, W.N. & Kellogg, The Ape and the Child, New York: McGraw Hill.
- Scott & Fuller, (1965) Dog Behavior -The Genetic Basics, University
Chicago Press
- Scott, J.P., Ross, S., A.E. and King D.K. (1959) The Effects of Early
Enforced Weaning on Stickling Behavior of Puppies, J. Genetics Psychologist,
p5: 261-81
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Carmen L Battaglia holds a Ph.D. and Masters
Degree from Florida State University. As an AKC judge, researcher and writer, he
has been a leader in promotion of breeding better dogs and has written many
articles and several books.
|